REVIEW: Ghostbusters (2016)

Courtesy of Sony
If you haven’t heard about the insane backlash to Paul Feig’s Ghostbusters reboot (Reimagining? Reinterpretation? I can’t keep track of all these marketing buzzwords…) then I envy you. A tiny, yet extremely vocal group of geeks hasn’t stopping whining about a new version of the 1984 comedy classic being sacrilegious and “ruining their childhoods.”

If I roll my eyes any harder they’re going to fall right out of my head. First, Ghostbusters II proved the original creative team wasn’t above reproach almost 30 years ago. Second, I didn’t hear nearly as much vitriol when Hollywood cranked out endless reboots of comic book properties (Spider-Man) and old action movies (Total Recall, Point Break).

Honestly, I think a bunch of immature man-babies got mad because a grown-up took the “No Girls Allowed” sign off their clubhouse door. Because what director and co-writer Feig (who penned the screenplay with Kate Dippold) does best is make incisive, hilarious comedies with insanely talented women.

Once again, he’s put those skills to use here. The new Ghostbusters is far better – funny and scary in equal measure – than I could’ve hoped for. It might not reach the heights of the original (let’s be honest, no reboot was ever going to) but it does its own thing in a fun, entertaining way. In one of worst summer movie seasons in recent memory, that’s about all you can ask for.

Most importantly, Melissa McCarthy, Kristen Wiig, Leslie Jones and the incredible Kate McKinnon (seriously, this role should launch her into superstardom) make a terrific team. Throw in a staggeringly funny performance from Chris Hemsworth and a host of memorable cameos, and you’ve got an ensemble that keeps the movie compelling despite its occasional weak spots.

The premise is fairly simple: Erin Gilbert (Wiig) is a brilliant physics professor who is close to getting tenure at a prestigious university. However, her position is threatened after a book she wrote with a former colleague about the supernatural resurfaces on Amazon. With her job on the line, she tracks down Abby Yates (McCarthy) and begs her to take down the book.

She also meets Yates’ new partner, the gloriously weird Jillian Holtzmann (McKinnon, who would be a shoo-in for a Best Supporting Actress nomination if the Oscars respected comedy). A short time later, the women encounter a number of ghosts and learn a nefarious plot is underway to shatter the barrier between our world and the spirit realm.

Fortunately, they cross paths with Patty Tolan (Jones), a transit worker who moonlights as a historian. With her help, the new Ghostbusters are able to figure out which New York City landmarks attract the most spirits. Not as useful is Kevin (Hemsworth), the hunky guy that Erin hires as their secretary even though he’s bafflingly stupid.

If there’s one thing I’ve learned about Feig’s movies, it’s that they’re impossible to sell in a standard trailer. His previous films – Bridesmaids, The Heat and Spy – were all terrific, but they had stunningly bad marketing. Now that I’ve seen his version of Ghostbusters, I can attest that it suffered the same fate. As far as I can tell, that’s because his style of humor is character-based, which is hard to sell in a two-minute ad. The punchlines are only funny if you hear them in context, as opposed to isolated and backed with a poppy score.

I knew I was in great hands from the opening scene, as a tour guide played by Zach Woods (from The Office and Silicon Valley) leads visitors through a haunted mansion while throwing out hilariously random facts about the previous owners. After everyone leaves, he encounters a truly frightening supernatural entity that shows just how far special effects have advanced since the original Ghostbusters, as well as how adept Feig is at handling them. (I rarely recommend spending extra money on 3D, but I was impressed at its use here.)

The movie also proves that Feig understands scares are just as important as laughs. Granted, no one’s going to mistake this for a flat-out horror movie, but the filmmaker understands the stakes aren’t real if the audience doesn’t believe the ghosts pose a genuine threat to people. It helps that he stages the action sequences with real excitement. The climactic set piece, though it stifles the comedy for a bit, genuinely got my adrenaline pumping. One moment in particular (which I wouldn’t dream of spoiling) caused the crowd in my screening to burst into applause.

But the real reason Ghostbusters is worth seeing is for the performances. McKinnon, Hemsworth and Jones are going to receive most of the accolades (as well they should, since they caused me to laugh so hard I stopped breathing), but I’d be remiss if I didn’t highlight the equally strong, but less showy work from McCarthy and Wiig.

I’ve always preferred McCarthy’s “wide-eyed believer” characters over the uncouth slobs that made her famous, so her performance here worked like gangbusters for me. I’m also starting to suspect that Wiig will get overlooked because she’s such a gifted straight woman. In the opening scene, there’s a moment when someone questions Erin about her past and Wiig makes her eye twitch almost imperceptibly; it’s so good that I grinned like an idiot for the next few minutes. She’s so good that it seems effortless.

Granted, the humor dissipates a bit once the plot kicks into gear in the third act and there’s a bit too much winking fan service (sadly, it’s thrown in for whiny fanboys who won’t appreciate it anyway), but those negatives aren’t enough to outweigh the tremendous positives of the hilarious cast. I hope this new Ghostbusters cleans up at the box office so I can see more adventures with these characters. The scene at the end of the closing credits undoubtedly suggests there are more stories to tell.

Ghostbusters is rated PG-13 for supernatural action and some crude humor.

Grade: B+

Comments